From: Gina Miller (echoz@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Jan 16 1999 - 16:26:10 MST
Have you read the article in Chemical and Engineering News (January
11,1999). Called "Much Ado About Nanotubes, by Ron Dagani
Gina "Nanogirl" Miller
echoz@hotmail.com
http://www.delphi.com
>Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 15:50:01 -0500
>To: extropians@extropy.com
>From: "Alexander 'Sasha' Chislenko" <sasha1@netcom.com>
>Subject: POLI: Concrete Umbrellas (was: Faster driving saves lives)
>Reply-To: extropians@extropy.com
>
>At 14:33 01/16/99 , Forrest Bishop wrote:
>
>>You can also argue reducio ad absurdum - lowering the limit to zero
will
>>'save' all the lives. I have never seen anyone do an analysis of this
>>phenomenon like the one above; why do you suppose that is? Might it
>>conflict with the kindergarten culture belief sysem?
>
>I think people would tell you that they "have to drive" to "survive".
>
>I have offered some reductio ad absurdum suggestions before that are
>clear of this "have to" issue, for example:
>
>- building overpasses instead of all crossings and concrete walls
around
> all streets should eliminate all accidents evolving pedestrians
> (except that the pedestrians crazy from spending all their time on
> building the overpasses and climbing up and down, may start jumping
> off them, or smashing their heads at the walls)
>
>- A great reduction in crime may be achieved by putting all
non-productive
> members of the society in solitary confinement with maximal security.
>
>- making everybody carry 100lb concrete umbrellas when outdoors, to
protect
> them against possible meteorites, sudden huge hailings, and other
falling
> objects.
>
>(of course, one can prohibit everything that is not absolutely
necessary,
> such as driving to movies or sports games, or any fun activities. But
then,
> people may find that the life itself is no longer really "important")
>
>
> The apparent truth here is that people want not to optimize their
safety
>at any cost, but to find a reasonable compromise between risk factors,
>efforts, quality of life, lifespan, etc. This is not a specifically
extropian
>opinion, it's plain common sense.
>
>Now, why there is so little publicity for these suggestions, and
support for
>balanced approach, while the risk aversion suggestions receive millions
of
>dollars for "research", and billions - for implementation? How can we
respond
>to that publication now, so that everybody could see it? (Actually, it
may
>be possible to write an article for NYT or something - anybody
interested to
>work on it?)
>
>The issue I think is that the distribution of ideas is propelled by
power
>interests more than by their truth value; this problem is apparently
worst
>with the centralized power, though a mechanism for distribution of
critical
>evaluations of non-coercive projects is also quite needed.
>
>So they offer lop-sided arguments that sound convincing enough for the
majority
>of the population, who do not care to think of balanced social
approaches or
>philosophical foundations of the legal system. And that's enough to
justify
>further funding for "protective" projects, further expansion of the
state, etc.
>
>Who would pay millions of dollars for the study showing what kinds of
risks
>people are willing to bear in their pursuit of quality of life,
freedom, and
>happiness? Not the State, I think.
>
>I would expect that some visionary journalistic efforts aimed at the
Slow Zone
>could make some difference here. But they, apparently, don't, with
all those
>civil libertarians and journalists out there. Or maybe, they couldn't
find the
>right meme?
>
>An article on Concrete Umbrellas, anyone?
>
>I actually strongly doubt that a well-chosen phrase can generally make
much
>difference, but since the illogical swamp of social ideas tends to
swing
>between polar states, and social policies keep being followed until
they
>become not just theoretically ungrounded, but hugely ridiculous and
wasteful,
>exposing problems at these critical points early may help swing both
opinions
>and policies. - Another task for the Institute of Memetic Engineering?
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>Alexander Chislenko <http://www.lucifer.com/~sasha/home.html>
><sasha1@netcom.com> <sasha@media.mit.edu>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:51 MST