From: Mark D. Fulwiler (mfulwiler@earthlink.net)
Date: Tue Jan 12 1999 - 15:14:13 MST
First of all, I should point out that I do not believe in natural
rights. Nature does not grant you any rights. In fact , if you are
thrown out in the middle of nature you are likely to starve or be eaten
by a wild animal if you do not use your intelligence. Nonetheless,
societies do develop certain legally enforceable rights. These rights
are, essentially, claims that may be backed up with force. They may be
based on any number of reasons, both good and bad. As a libertarian, I
hope that the legal rights of a society are individual rights as I
believe that that regime of rights results in the most satisfactory
state of affairs for both individuals and society in general.
Re: Animal rights. My opinion is that animals should be granted limited
rights depending on their level of intelligence and their ability to
suffer and feel pain. I don't think ownership of any animal should give
you the right to torture it for your pleasure. There was a man in this
area who tortured and killed cats by twisting their necks and throwing
them against walls. This behavior really made me sick and I have a hard
time imagining a good defense for it. (I have two kitties and I love
them dearly.) Any society that would allow this behavior on the basis
that "animals are property and therefore you may do with your property
what you will" is not one that I care to be a part of. Unlike cars or
pens, cats are sentient beings and that ought to limit what you are
allowed to do with them.
Mark Fulwiler
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:48 MST