From: Billy Brown (bbrown@conemsco.com)
Date: Tue Dec 15 1998 - 10:18:05 MST
<continued from previous post>
Let us suppose for a moment that we accept the above arguments as
substantially accurate (not that I think anyone will :-) ). What could we
then deduce about the next century?
Well, for starters we can say that we aren't going to go from the first
assembler to mature nanotech overnight. Nanotech simply makes physical
construction more like software design - you still have to design something
before you can build it, and the design complexity will choke even 2020-era
computers (not to mention human engineers) long before you get to utility
fog.
Fortunately, that means that a gray goo scenario is unlikely. Actually
making a nanodevice capable of out-competing everything in Earth's biosphere
would be a daunting project during the early nanotech era. It is much more
likely that weapons research will create limited versions, and defenses
against them, in a continuation of the same patterns we are familiar with.
As computers get faster, and software design methods improve, our ability to
build complex nanotechnological devices will advance rapidly. If we are
still relying on humans at that point we will probably see something that
looks like the computer revolution, but applied to all material goods -
every year everything is smaller, faster, better and cheaper. If we have AI
or human intelligence enhancement at that point the rate of change will be
much faster.
Of course, even moderately mature nanotechnology will soon lead to
intelligence enhancement, which leads to better nanotech and more
intelligence enhancement, and so on. We still get a Singularity, but there
are constraints on what kind we can have:
1) It is unlikely to be driven by any single technology. You need broad
advances in many different fields to sustain the process.
2) It is unlikely to be dominated by any small group, let alone an
individual. There is no single breakthrough that will give you the whole
enchilada, so you get a faster version of the tech advance we are familiar
with.
3) It is unlikely to be precipitated by a seed AI. Unless it turns out to
be very easy to become an SI, it will not be able to invent everything it
needs by itself.
4) It is likely that a substantial portion of society will have the
opportunity to become Transhuman during the early nanotech phase.
5) By the time we have moderately advanced nanotech, we will probably also
have lots of people with Transhuman IQ and assorted other enhancements. By
the time society has mature nanotechnology, it will be dominated by
proto-SIs and other nigh-incomprehensible beings.
OK, here I am, waaaaay out on this limb. Anyone have a saw?
Billy Brown, MCSE+I
bbrown@conemsco.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:50:01 MST