Re: Wilson's mental hierarchy

From: Paul Hughes (planetp@aci.net)
Date: Fri Dec 11 1998 - 23:44:45 MST


Damien Broderick wrote:

> At 12:50 AM 12/11/98 -0800, Paul Hughes wrote
>
> >Lest we forget, it was [Eliezer] and Damien who decided to flame me first.
>
> Sorry if you read my (rather bluntly expressed) comment on RAW/Leary as a
> flame directed personally at you. I was trying to convey a general point -
> I apologise if you felt wounded.
>
> I don't think there's much point in citing the outdated views of great
> scientists when the original daft document claimed that parts of the brain
> were designed for that future era when we enter our eventual
> extraterrestrial kingdom.

I apologize if you somehow got the idea that I ever supported this "embryonic
extraterrestrial intelligence" waiting to emerge, as I said I don't quite early
in this fiasco. What started out as a wonderful and stimulating conversation
for me personally, quickly devolved into what clearly became a concentrated
flame by you and Eliezer of why I would ever quote such 'gibberish'. Last I
checked a footnote is not a quote. Besides, I was simply trying to bring the
8-circuit model into the conversation as a way of making a point about
free-will vs. Eliezer's well developed Singularity hypothesis. Unfortunately,
both of you decided to find the most admittedly loony parts of this footnote
and completely distract the intended direction I was trying to move the
conversation. Despite the several pleas I made to move past this distraction,
you and Eliezer decided to continue your "crusade" against Wilson and
everything he stands for, as if *I* am somehow his loyal supporter. Get real!
Meanwhile, Eliezer and you continued to conveniently ignore *all* scientific or
rational information I brought into the thread. As far as I'm concerned you
might as well have attacked me personally - it had the same effect - complete
dismissal of my *own* ideas and integrity. And based on what? A footnote to
someone else's writing!?

Needless to say, I'm now reluctantly ambivalent about certain list members
credibility.

Paul Hughes



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:58 MST