From: Ian Goddard (Ian@Goddard.net)
Date: Tue Oct 27 1998 - 22:45:29 MST
At 08:46 PM 10/27/98 -0800, Max More wrote:
>
>Nick, I do think the Nazi history is sometimes a source of fear and
>resistance. When I spoke at a conference in Germany about integration of
>technology into the human being to enhance function, a German women stood
>up and strongly hinted that I was a Nazi. This will keep happening to us. I
>think it's important, when responding, to stress that we want these
>technologies to be available but we are utterly opposed to compelling
>anyone to use them. (That's an important reason for having the Open Society
>principle.) We may face more difficulties if the day comes when a group of
>transhumanists form who *do* want to force everyone to upgrade according to
>the groups plans.
IAN: In fact, it stands to reason that "socialist
transhumanism" would be "compulsory transhumanism,"
because a socialist plan is government implemented
and thus compulsory, and therefore the libertarian
ethic is the definitionally anti-Nazi >H policy;
and as such, the libertarian ethic is the only
policy compatible with ethical transhumanism.
**************************************************************
Visit Ian Williams Goddard --------> http://Ian.Goddard.net
______________________________________________________________
"The smallest minority on earth is the individual.
Those who deny individual rights cannot claim
to be defenders of minorities." Ayn Rand
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:42 MST