From: Cen-IT Rob Harris (Rob.Harris@bournemouth.gov.uk)
Date: Tue Sep 15 1998 - 03:20:40 MDT
> [Reuben: ]
>
> The only problem with that paragraph is that it mixes 'you
> can't judge any morality to be wrong - it's subjective' together with
> a
> moral judgement - 'don't judge other's morality'.
>
> It's a paradox I've never really figured out.
>
>
Rob:
I've seen this paradox, too. There is a way round it though (for
me, anyway). You have to dump the whole concept of judgment as valid.
After all, whether you think it's all environment or
environment+genetics that forge a person, we are forged externally
(externally to our conciousness) all the same. (I note this as your
average non-thinker will try to force the 'all environment' argument, as
if that provides 'accountability'. They wish to preserve
'accountability', as this in turn provides opportunity for judgement, a
kind of secondary accelerator to the natural selection process whereby
we will feel the need to judge eachother, then attempt to 'pass a
sentence' which may mean death. If we are socially/physically strong, we
will succeed and the weaker organism will be removed, if we are weaker,
the 'sentence' will not be passed, the stronger organism will still
survive, no harm done).
My (please shred it if you disagree) idea of a possible function of
conciousness is as a frame of reference for the brain to work to. After
all, no one has managed to program a computer to feel pleasure or pain,
or give a monkeys about anything yet......it's the conciousness which
adds context to the whole idea of motivation. This would make the
conciousness merely an 'observer' to the actions of the predisposed
human/other sentient creature. After all, the game plan (of human life
as we know it) was already defined when we came in, and individuals from
generation to generation never, ever effect changes to our central
motivation. Therefore, either conciousnesses are 'totally happy and at
peace' (all pleasure, no pain) with being integrated with humans, and so
don't affect any real change (no way), or they have no pre-provided
ability to affect any change.
- Obviously, this has damning implications for the concept of
judgement. It's like the moon judging the yellowness of the sun against
it's silveryness, deciding that the sun isn't silvery enough and that
yellow is 'quargakk' (evil). Pointless and irrelevant.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:35 MST