From: Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com)
Date: Fri Sep 04 1998 - 21:43:22 MDT
Bryan Moss wrote:
>In the second example A and B's communication is
>filtered (or moderated) to become a useful part of
>the neural net. In the first example the two would
>have to come to some sort of agreement. In the
>second example the decision making process happens
>in the neural net, which is a product of A and B's
>interaction. With a larger network of people,
>communication between the two would join a neural
>net built from the interactions between millions
>of people and a far more complex decision making
>process would take place.
>
I'm a bit cynical here - this sounds like electronic communism to me...
O--------------------------------O
| Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> |
| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 |
| |
| Death is for animals; |
| immortality for gods. |
| Technology is the means by |
| which we make the transition. |
O--------------------------------O
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:32 MST