From: boogie woogie (extrogod@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Aug 27 1998 - 10:19:14 MDT
I'm not understanding why we should be giving this Doomsday Argument a
lot of weight. How improbable is it that we are even here? How
improbable is it that life ever organized in the first place? I'm
thinking we're lucky as hell to be here in the state we're in. Since
this luck has been with us for the last 15 billion years or so who is to
say it won't stick with us for another 100 billion? Maybe the Doomsday
Argument has some weight under normal circumstances but we aren't
normal. We're extraordinary. Life is extraordinary. If someone was
around to think about whether life would ever arise from the primordial
soup they would probably say 99.99999% chance that it would not. But it
did. Statistics are only relevant for describing the history and getting
some general idea about how things might behave in the future. But to
take this Doomsday Argument and say we're probably screwed and that
everyone needs to take time away from more meaningful pursuits to ponder
it and rifle through endless obscure philosophical crap is, in my
opinion, overemphasis. If the Argument is true then, by the very nature
of it, there isn't squat we can do. So why dwell on it?
Colin
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:31 MST