From: jakob rębild (bluerabbit@designnet.dk)
Date: Fri Aug 21 1998 - 05:54:00 MDT
J P Chambers wrote:
> Nicholas Bostrom Wrote :
>
> > The situation is simply this. I got a messege from
> > Jonathan Grimes, wherein he was jubilant about how
> > easy a time he had had tricking everybody into
> > believing in the censorship rumor. At this stage I
> > thought I should write the four lines quoted above,
> > since I saw that Max and other ExI members were being
> > unfairly accused of censorship, and their webmaster
> > was spending a lot of time trying to restore the
> > missing part of the archive. It would have been wrong
> > of me not to speak up.
>
> I take complete responsibility for Jenny Chambers.
> I take absolutely no responsibility for the censorship
> rumour.
> You are fabricating evidence. That is a serious criminal offence.
> I have in no way tampered with the list archives.
> The list archive computers are the property of Extropy.
> I have in no way tampered with the list archive
> computer system.
> Tampering with the list archives is a criminal offence.
> I am not a criminal.
> You are accusing me of being a criminal.
> I demand you retract this fabrication of evidence.
> I demand an apology from Nicholas Bostrom and Extropy.
> Jonathan Grimes
mr. grimes. did you redefine 'truth' and 'honesty' while i slept? every
word i've seen you write on this list and off it is without a doubt the
most appaling and ridiculously large amount of bullshit i've seen for a
very long time.
you _demand_ an apology? would you apologize to a rabid dog for shooting
its head off?
being somewhat of an authority on cult movements and mind control
tactics of the same, i am shocked by your actions towards extropy
institure and this list. extropy as a cult could be nothing further from
the truth.
i strongly suggest that you start reading up on the subjects you claim
to know to much of, i'm quite certain that the objective litterature
could work its way even to your mind and give you some understanding of
what extropy and transhumanism is. if this should still be a problem, i
suggest that you seek psychiatric and maybe even medical attention
before continuing your daily life.
i cannot denamd that you get removed, this is a free list, any less than
you can demand anything from your position. i can assure you that my
attorney wouldn't touch this case from your view, although i'd like to
see someone try. you accuse nick bostrom of fabricating evidence,
doesn't fabricating evidence include that there is a court in session?
you claim not to be a criminal. that may be so, but that doesn't stop me
from wishing you would be locked up. judging from your postings, i'd say
you're dangerous.
jakob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:29 MST