From: Philip Witham (p.j.witham@ieee.org)
Date: Fri Aug 14 1998 - 13:16:01 MDT
(This is a reply to an email from Robin Hanson. Robin, I glitched by replying directly to you, sorry, and I hope you don't mind my quoting you on the group.)
>>The early units were Nitric acid and Aniline motors.
>Umm, help me out here. Aniline as in rubber?
It's a liquid, a hypergol with several things.
>>>the PR (/perceived environmental) impact of a *BIG* boom can be daunting,
>>Yes. Perception again. Sea launch=little boom.
>I know. But sea launch + BDB = too many new things for investors' milklike
>perceptions (see below).
Yes, and I personally am not so hot on sea launch, after doing some testing at sea, it looks like you loose as many benefits as you gain.
>I do have a vivid mental image of mutant spacefaring barnacles, descended
>from sea launches many millennia before. :)
Yes! Complete with their own water vapor jets, spreading from satellite to satellite. Eeek!
>>Never say that, have you forgotten our principles?! Gasp!
>
>Sorry, I balked for a moment. Residual sarcasm. :)
>>Us space enthusiasts are our own worst enemy, all pointing to the stars,
>but all in different directions.
>
>Didn't Bucky say "out, not up?" :)
>
>But I definitely ditto your "sheesh!"
>
>I hope we're not our own *worst* enemy. But I think it is instructive to
>remember "when the natural human urge to explore is too long thwarted,
>perversions arise." This includes acting on impulses such as "What can I
>convince someone sounds plausible, incremental or sexy so I can get a
>job doing it and milk it forever?"
>
>MMB
Hmmn... Interesting thought.
-PW
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:27 MST