Of historical interest (Re: a total Roton reversal, with apologies)

From: Michael M. Butler (butlerj-nkmail@comp-lib.org)
Date: Tue Aug 11 1998 - 23:33:28 MDT


Just wanted to post the URLs for the "original" Roton paper on the Web.

http://www.hmx.com/roton_paper.html and
http://www.hmx.com/roton_paper_fn.html

This paper asserts something like a 10:1 thrust contribution from the rotor
"while in the sensible atmosphere". I haven't seen any detailed profiles,
but I'd guess the rotor thrust contribution for this configuration does
start to poop out at something like 10 miles' altitude. Still, the first
miles _are_ where you have to burn most of your propellant--accelerating
the rest--and the fact that the vehicle *is* being accelerated does make it
potentially a bigger win than the old "rockoon" concept.

PS: it appears that Bevin McK., coiner of the "Roton" label, has agreed to
dilute the term "Roton" to include systems that don't use rotors for boost
phase. C'est la marketing. Long live the radical unRotonoids. :)

MMB

===================> Am I expecting a message from you? <=====================
  If you're not sure, may I suggest you change my return address when/if you
  send mail? Remove the bracketed portion of butler[j-nkmail]@comp-lib.org
===================> "Go team, beat SP*M." <=====================
"The highest love [is] uniquely human, the product of compassion and liberty--
    _not one at the expense of the other_." -- L. A. Chu & M. M. Butler
                  



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:27 MST