Re: lack of hot Extropian women?

From: Sunah Caroline Cherwin (slippery@pobox.com)
Date: Sun Aug 09 1998 - 12:54:22 MDT

Next message: Max More: "Re: 5,000,000,000 transhumans?"
Previous message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: lack of hot Extropian women?"
In reply to: William John: "lack of hot Extropian women?"
Next in thread: Thom Quinn: "lack of transhumanist women?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>>>>Don't worry about those few Extropian females dude, they're mostly
>lesbians :-) >>Because of our dorky image, no self-respecting hot babe
>>>> will associate with us (not to mention the fact that attractive people,
>especially >>women, are usually shallow). Go blame society!
>
>>What! What? What on earth are you talking about.
>
>>>Hardly. Natasha, for example, is pretty hot, and she's one of our inspired
>leaders.
>
>>Thank you Mike Lorrey for your rational thinking.
>
>Yes Mike, Natasha is really hot but since she is "taken" or unavailable (you
>lucky guy Max!). Us single Transhumanist guys can't really count her because
>of this. Remi and Katherine Aegis are the only other posting messengers to
>this list that I can think of. I don't know their availability status.

Now why in the world do you suppose hot women wouldn't want to post to this
list?

--
Sunah Caroline Cherwin           +   +            http://pobox.com/~sunah
Member: HTML Writer's Guild        +       Member: San Francisco Webgrrls
Free services for webheads  http://www.slip.net/~suzy/demo/services.shtml

Next message: Max More: "Re: 5,000,000,000 transhumans?"
Previous message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: lack of hot Extropian women?"
In reply to: William John: "lack of hot Extropian women?"
Next in thread: Thom Quinn: "lack of transhumanist women?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:26 MST