From: Robin Hanson (hanson@econ.berkeley.edu)
Date: Thu Aug 06 1998 - 10:59:58 MDT
Hal F. writes:
>>... (1) Through gradual augmentation of their biological
>>brains, ... (2) Through mind uploading.
>
>There is no natural place to draw a line between these two, however.
>A biological body augmented with nanotech may use materials we don't
>normally associate with biology. There is a continuum between ordinary
>biological bodies and things like cyborgs and robots. ... Trying to
>categorize their means as biological vs technological is not going to
>be useful in the long run.
It seems to me that there is at least one striking difference worth
naming, between systems which have been designed and understood from the
ground up, and evolved systems which we have tweaked and adapted to our
purposes. Cars vs. Cows.
While larger systems may contain subsystems of both types, I expect
limitations on the granularity of integration, exactly because our
limited understanding of evolved systems limits our flexibility in
interfacing them with other systems. Maybe all we really want out of
cows are certain chemical processes in their stomaches, but cow systems
are hard to disentangle, so we'll leave them as units for some time to
come.
I recall Drexler having written about this issue regarding nanotech.
Robin Hanson
hanson@econ.berkeley.edu http://hanson.berkeley.edu/
RWJF Health Policy Scholar, Sch. of Public Health 510-643-1884
140 Warren Hall, UC Berkeley, CA 94720-7360 FAX: 510-643-2627
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:25 MST