From: Eugene Leitl (eugene@liposome.genebee.msu.su)
Date: Thu Jul 16 1998 - 09:04:34 MDT
Nick Bostrom writes:
> Robin Hanson:
>
> > The earliest uploads will likely be cryonics patients, without much
> > hope of getting a regular body anytime soon.
Why should they want to get bodies? Apart from intrinsically higher
and drastically cheaper diversity in artificial reality, a Dysonian
computer cluster or a Jupiter brain is not a suitable environment
for any classical body. Why limiting oneself to human senses if I
can utilize anything from proximal probe over accelerometry,
magnetometry, MS, particle detectors, inteferometry arrays, &c&c?
Exercise your own imagination on the motorics part. But, once again,
if the material realm of a stellar system is entirely under your
control, maxing out on computation while keeping the number of
resources allocated to sensomotorics at an absolute mininimum (in a
pinch, you could always reuse these atoms in new configurations albeit
at a time penalty and resources wasted in dormant basal autoreplicator
capability) is obviously a good strategy. Only coevolution-artefacted
nonlinearities would seem to disturb the Brave New Postmaterial
world scheme. (Of course, as this is way PostSingularity, we're off
exploring the Neverneverextrapolation-land again. Pray don't knock
down the lametta, the ultraviolet bunnies hate that).
> At least they could get a good robot body. That's already possible
> today. What more can anybody possibly ask for than a pair of
> vidoecameras to see with, a pair of microphones to hear with, and a
> set of hydraulic limbs to move around with? ;-)
Thank you, I'd rather be a cluster of active-orbit-controlled
boxes in high solar orbit swinging around my own gravitation center,
while other parts of me are busily processing our stellar
neighbourhood. (Of course there will be probably no 'me', just a memetic
bouillabaisse (sp?) virtually swirling in diverse bitbuckets of multiple
shapes and sizes).
> Anyway, I don't think that uploading will be possible until we have
> mature nanotechnology and by then it might also be possible to
Nanotechnology strong enough to allow autoreplication by
mechanosynthesis is actually unnecessary for uploading, in a pinch we
could settle with vanilla molecular circuitry/macroscopic autoreplicators.
Since the plumbing layer is not visible in artificial reality, this
should not concern us too much (but it would be less pretty, agreed).
See Joe Strout's pages for details.
> manufacture human bodies (though it's a difficult task).
If drextech is feasible, a way of producing living tissue and whole
living critters would seem to build a beasty in vitrified state around
a fractal diamondoid channel/scaffolding network, then flash-devitrify
it into life by pumping energy into the network and dissipating it
more or less uniformly, then retracting/breaking down the
scaffolding. Of course even if we do it very gently, it will give the
homo novus more than a case of sore throat, but it should be
survivable, especially if we allow for a bit of anaesthesized
regeneration. See no point in it, though. Bodies are out of fashion.
'gene
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:21 MST