From: Randall R Randall (rrandall6@juno.com)
Date: Tue Jul 14 1998 - 00:43:17 MDT
--
On Mon, 13 Jul 1998 21:34:09 -0700 (PDT) John K Clark <johnkc@well.com>
writes:
Harv writes:
> >To terminate one copy and measure the acceptability from the
> >viewpoint of another copy seems unacceptable to me.
>
>There is no alternative. If one copy has been terminated I can't measure
his
>viewpoint because he doesn't have one.
> >Is it OK for one copy to be horribly crippled in the murder
attempt
> >while the other goes unscathed?
>
>No, because the poor horrible cripple does have a viewpoint.
>
> >If one of them were in pain, and it bothered you, would killing
it
> >resolve you problem?
>
>Obviously.
It seems to me that the same argument could
be applied to *anyone* you wanted to kill. After
all, they won't care afterward, right? The copy
is irrelevant to the situation of the person here.
You seem to be saying that killing people at
random is fine, as long as it is painless?
--digsig
Wolfkin.
5CaaHx/ncmWI7mi94lMRbZ5naWfoiAiWyG37UUfee/P
vAPfVItFOoVZwl/xu20ldwiqN85rWbMzt0VASC8G
47sc1LJRQCDjvK6CQQ87CmCqiyi8Pt+fT4nzk8vUw
wolfkin@flatoday.infi.net | ICQ: 3043097
E-Gold Acct: 100678 @ www.e-gold.com
On a visible but distant shore a new image of man,
The shape of his own future, now in his own hands.
| Johnny Clegg
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:21 MST