From: Randall R Randall (rrandall6@juno.com)
Date: Tue Jul 07 1998 - 10:59:31 MDT
--
On Tue, 07 Jul 1998 11:20:25 +0200 den Otter <neosapient@geocities.com>
writes:
>Fact: most attackers are agressive, strong men. Many of the victims
>are not (old people, women, children). Guns are the equalizer.
>Other weapons (like tasers) are either unreliable or require
>close contact (knives, bats etc.) and a very considerable risk of
>injury to the victim, plus they don't work well against groups, so
>they're hardly an option.
Actually, tasers would be an excellent option, except
that they are not as intimidating as a gun, and here in
the US, at least, they are even more questionable
than a gun, if you use it. Tasers are seen as "police"
or SWAT weapons, so if you have one, you must be
some sort of wacko...:(
--digsig
Wolfkin.
5CaaHx/ncmWI7mi94lMRbZ5naWfoiAiWyG37UUfee/P
wsPp5H7tUiy46czmZeCkzJ+NSMtPErRP3cS9p0Jq
4EADpzah4CDeYRDG9r1wwYM5CoSnWzMSm8ZM2mlqL
wolfkin@flatoday.infi.net | ICQ: 3043097
E-Gold Acct: 100678 @ www.e-gold.com
On a visible but distant shore a new image of man,
The shape of his own future, now in his own hands.
| Johnny Clegg
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:18 MST