From: Technotranscendence (neptune@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Sat Jul 04 1998 - 08:58:14 MDT
Since morality has been discussed much on this list, I thought this "definition"
might be of interest -- especially, since many people on the list seem to equate
"morality" with "social ethics." If that were so, then morality would be needed
only in a society. It would have no meaning for a lone individual.
Daniel Ust
http://www.oasismag.com/Issues/9802/story-ust.html
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 22:18:44 -0500 (CDT)
From: Michael Hardy <hardy@stat.umn.edu>
Subject: proposed definition of morality
I somewhat tentatively propose the following as definitions:
_Morality_ is the deliberate subordination of conduct to normative
principles because such subordination is necessary for the pursuit
of excellence.
_Excellence_ is the flourishing of the volitionally created self.
These are heavily theory-laden definitions: Outside the
context of a Randian theory of free will they don't make sense.
Mike
-- Michael Hardy hardy@stat.umn.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:17 MST