From: Max M (maxm@maxmcorp.dk)
Date: Fri Jun 26 1998 - 00:04:21 MDT
Anders Sandberg wrote:
>
> den Otter <neosapient@geocities.com> writes:
> > Although this machine wouldn't be "conscious" like a human, it would
> > nonetheless still classify as "intelligent", since it could
> > learn from its own and other's mistakes or success, and improve
> > its performance. Is this what they call "weak" AI?
>
> I'm not sure, but it is close. I seem to recall that "weak" AI is
> systems that can do a lot of apparently intelligent stuff, but aren't
> really intelligent. Strong AI claims that it is possible to build
> truly intelligent systems. Maybe a better term would be Asimov AI - AI
> with built in servitor programming.
Well actually as far as i remember, a weak superintelligence is just as
intelligent as a human. Only it is greatly overclocked. It doesn't work
smarter just faster.
But maybe im mixing my AI's and my superintelligences here?
Hilsen/regards
Max M Rasmussen
New Media Director
Denmark
Work:
mailto:maxm@normik.dk
http://www.normik.dk
Private:
mailto:maxm@maxmcorp.dk
http://www.maxmcorp.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:14 MST