From: John K Clark (johnkc@well.com)
Date: Wed Jun 10 1998 - 08:56:13 MDT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 9 Jun 98 anduril@cix.compulink.co.uk (Tony Hollick) Wrote:
>Maxwell's theory does conform fully with Classical Mechanics.
No it does not, although Maxwell tried very hard to make it do so. Maxwell's
greatest triumph came when he proved that a changing electrical field creates
a changing magnetic field and a changing magnetic field creates a changing
electrical field. He then proved that this phenomena propagated as a wave at
a speed of 1/(EM)^1/2 , where E and M are the well known electric and
magnetic constants, this give a speed of 3*10^8 M/sec and this was exactly
the speed for light that was experimentally and independently found.
The match was too close, it couldn't be a coincidence, light must be an
electromagnetic wave.
There was one nagging little problem however, the electric and magnetic
constants are the same for everybody, that's why they're called constants,
and that means that the speed of light would be the same for every observer.
Maxwell thought this was a (minor) flaw in his theory, he assumed that his
derivation of the speed of light was only for an observer that was at
absolute rest, but this assumption was definitely not in the equation,
it said not one thing about the motion of an observer. Maxwell tried to
modify his theory to make his assumption explicit but he failed, 40 years
later Einstein explained why he failed and why a modification was not needed.
John K Clark johnkc@well.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i
iQCzAgUBNX6LYn03wfSpid95AQFe+ATw11bn/SIdMX2f76HLzkwYKClOF3ULULTy
gtaaK8a7lZ27lrZQkiDqDBHof+2TJy1xpIQhyxh7Rz+dBxdByueXM7mQt8rWHjhf
YGW7ls4AYCg/Kx69oAd5q+4TjP38yzWiTSoc/fqQ4noTWSHZE1bjetNWIbeugqSc
YGClFSipx+abb/3M74niQarzBNgBR/qOsDZh/t/DcGL2X4mW3GY=
=LG9Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:11 MST