Re: TWA Flight 800, reflections on

From: Ian Goddard (igoddard@netkonnect.net)
Date: Sun May 24 1998 - 23:18:24 MDT


At 12:36 AM 5/23/98 -0700, Hara Ra wrote:

>After all the ballyhoo regarding TWA Flight 800, especially
>by Ian Goddard, I note with some irony that the FAA has been
>inspecting jets with similar construction (ie, power and signal
>cables in the center fuel tank) and GUESS WHAT! A number of
>inspected planes have faulty wiring, some with arc burns which
>holed the conduit in the fuel tank, many with chafed wiring
>exposing the conductor, etc.

  IAN: Maybe it was such a spark that over 100
  witnesses saw shoot up, trailing white smoke to
  take down the plane, at least 96 of whom saw it
  originate on the surface. But I doubt that any
  of the wires of a 747 at 13,700 ft would also
  be located on the surface of the ocean, or
  even if so, arch 13,700 ft to the plane.

  Also, while the NTSB cannot say how a spark could
  get into the CFT, there's no reason to believe that
  even if one did that it would cause an explosion.
  The fuel used in commercial jets is Jet A-1, which,
  unlike gasoline, does not easily explode. You can
  put out a cigarette in Jet A-1. It is not until
  the fuel is 127 degrees that it becomes flammable.

  The FBI/CIA Evergreen test claiming to prove
  that the fuel in a test plane was flammable at
  14,000 did so in a plane with a 17-degree hotter
  ambient temperature than existed in TWA 800!

  See letters from Commander Bill Donaldson:
  http://members.aol.com/bardonia2/ntsb7.htm
  http://members.aol.com/bardonia/hearings.htm

  Furthermore, fuel explosions are weak explosions.
  Fuel explosions are * combustions * NOT detonations.
  A combustion is when the explosive reaction travels
  through the explosive material at a subsonic rate.
  A combustion in the center of the plane will not
  rip the nose off of the plane (which was the
  first thing that happened). I could list many
  examples of physical damage that occurred to
  the plane and the passengers that define
  high-velocity forces far in excess of
  any low-velocity vapor combustion.

  The CFT theory is a crackpot theory that may be
  "good enough" to fool some of the people some of
  the time, but not all of the people all the time.

****************************************************************
VISIT IAN WILLIAMS GODDARD --------> http://Ian.Goddard.net
________________________________________________________________

TWA-800 CASE CORE --> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/twa-core.htm
________________________________________________________________

  "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its
 opponents and making them see the light, but rather because
  its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows
   up that is familiar with the idea from the beginning."

                 Max Plank - Nobel physicist

     "The smallest minority on earth is the individual.
       Those who deny individual rights cannot claim
         to be defenders of minorities." Ayn Rand



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:07 MST