From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Fri May 15 1998 - 23:43:09 MDT
Ian Goddard wrote:
> As such, we need not define a
"utilibertarian"
> paradigm, but instead a truthitarian
paradigm.
> It may all be sematics, particularly
if we can
> show that truth = utility, but I'm
not so sure.
It distresses me to learn that you don't
feel sure about this. Just remember that
a useful lie has more value than a
useless truth. --JRM
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:05 MST