Re: Phoney Unicorns

From: Ian Goddard (igoddard@netkonnect.net)
Date: Thu May 14 1998 - 17:22:08 MDT


At 11:11 AM 5/14/98 -0700, Yak Wax wrote:

>> IAN: That's almost as goofy as people who claim
>> that A is A free from not-A; of course, in the
>> fused-horn-goat case, there was at least a
>> single example of their case (fake as it
>> may have been), yet the atomists have
>> neither a real nor a fake unicorn.
>>
>> No, my mistake, the atomists have come up
>> with several fake cases, like Anton's cat
>> that was a cat free from the black void
>> around it defining it as a cat, bOiNg!
>> Wow, now that was one phoney unicorn!
>
>Ian, shut the fuck up.

 IAN: Another sore looser having a temper
 tantrum, how pathetic! As soon as people
 run out of argument all that's left is
 mud slinging and cursing, whatever it
 takes to stop inquiry. What else
 should we expect from a Yak that
 Yakked miserably against truth
 as the goal of inquiry? Heck,
 a Big Lie will do just fine!

 You may oppose truth and inquiry, but
 I do not, and thus will not shut up.
 Now go defecate in the toilet, not
 on this list, thank you very much.

********************************************************
Visit Ian W Goddard ---> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________
Statements T r u t h A defines -A
                a -A defines A
 A: x is A b A -A
                l T F A set is defined
-A: x is -A e F T by its members, thus
                    ? ? A & -A contain each other.
--------------------------------------------------------
H O L I S M ---> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/meta.htm
________________________________________________________

 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:05 MST