Re: The Peme Conflict Principle (was Is "Society" a Deep Peme?)

From: Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com)
Date: Sat May 02 1998 - 03:43:57 MDT


>[Note: Earlier parts of the peme debate --
>including the "peme rules" -- can be found
>at: '#TL075: Pemes = Political Memes' --
><http://www.buildfreedom.com/tl/tl075.htm>
>and '#TL076: The Twilight of the Phobocrats' --
><http://www.buildfreedom.com/tl/tl076.htm>,
>which are periodically updated.]

(interminable posting which is snipped)

Regarding this thread (which I have resolutely tried to
ignore)....

1. I see nothing exceptional about "pemes", as the
concept of "meme" covers it all quite nicely; perhaps
"predatory meme" is a better definition than "political
meme".

2. "reme" for religious meme
3. "seme" for subconsciou meme
4. "feme" for flaming meme

I guess it is all a matter of pemeist envy.

O--------------------------------O
| Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> |
| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 |
O--------------------------------O



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:02 MST