From: Warrl kyree Tale'sedrin (warrl@mail.blarg.net)
Date: Sat Apr 25 1998 - 04:55:26 MDT
> From: Max More <maxmore@primenet.com>
> While I agree with your other comments on this thread, I don't agree here.
> "Atheism" = a-theism. Since "theism" means a belief in a god, "atheism" is
> the absence of belief in a god.
Unfortunately, there is another analysis that is at least equally
valid.
Theism = theos + ism, god + belief.
Atheism = a + theos + ism, absence + god + belief.
The latter can be parsed from left to right (absence applied to god,
then the whole applied to belief = an affirmative belief that there
is no god) or from right to left (belief applied to god, then the
whole applied to absence = no belief on the subject of god).
Or if you really want to be weird, it can be parsed from the outside
in: god has no beliefs.
Since the languages we are working with here -- Greek and English --
typically read from left to right, the left-to-right parsing, which
gives an affirmative belief that there is no god, is most likely
correct.
This fits well with another word: agnosticism = a + gnosis + ism,
absence + knowledge + belief = "I don't know, I believe", read left
to right. A right-to-left reading would be, I don't believe in
knowledge.
US$500 fee for receipt of unsolicited commercial email. USC 47.5.II.227
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:59 MST