RE: META: Re: [Meta] - Attachment problem???

From: Sunah Caroline Cherwin (slippery@pobox.com)
Date: Sun Apr 12 1998 - 11:08:48 MDT

• Next message: me: "[META]: Attachment problem FIXED?!"
• Previous message: Charlotte Shore: "Re: humanism vs. transhumanism"
• Maybe in reply to: Eugene Leitl: "META: Re: [Meta] - Attachment problem???"
• Next in thread: Erik Moeller: "Re: META: Re: [Meta] - Attachment problem???"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>I can understand the benefits of having a listserv policy of using only
>plain text. I would have gladly followed that policy if *had I known my mail
>program wasn't set for that.*
>
>I hope I have this corrected now, and I hope we can all mellow out a bit on
>this topic. (I was a little freaked out by it myself, siince I didn't know what
>the problem was.)
>
>Jason
>
>Content-Type: application/ms-tnef
>
>Attachment converted: Chamomile:RE- META- Re- [Meta] - Attachme
>(????/----) (0001BA18)

See the attachment line? If you sent yourself mail as a test, you would
have seen the attachment line and we wouldn't.

--
Sunah Caroline Cherwin           +   +            http://pobox.com/~sunah
Member: HTML Writer's Guild        +       Member: San Francisco Webgrrls
Free services for webheads  http://www.slip.net/~suzy/demo/services.shtml
                              

• Next message: me: "[META]: Attachment problem FIXED?!"
• Previous message: Charlotte Shore: "Re: humanism vs. transhumanism"
• Maybe in reply to: Eugene Leitl: "META: Re: [Meta] - Attachment problem???"
• Next in thread: Erik Moeller: "Re: META: Re: [Meta] - Attachment problem???"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:54 MST