From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Sat Apr 11 1998 - 06:31:27 MDT
Eugene Leitl <eugene@liposome.genebee.msu.su> writes:
> On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, Randy Smith wrote:
>
> > I like it, Scott, and that's not to disparage the other definitions
> > others may have offered, but it kind of ties in with a Randy-Smith
> > truism: many, if not most, humans are, in some fundamental way,
> > unhappy. That ultimate state of self-actualization would seemingly
>
> If we were not unhappy, there would be zero impetus to change. No impetus
> to change in an coevolutionary context guarantees failure before long.
Very odd. I feel very happy, and I feel a big impetus to change. Would
I feel an even more intense impetus if I was unhappy? I doubt it; the
times I have felt unhabppy haven't motivated me as much as when I have
been happy to do something. I think the basic idea "unhappiness: lots
of action to get happier, happiness: satiety, no action" doesn't hold
well. There is a difference between the overall happiness level and
the amount of motivation; remember the separate "wanting" and "liking"
systems in the brain - you can want things even when you don't like
them, and vice versa (even if there often is a correlation).
Of course, I might be unrepresentative of humanity but I hope it isn't
so.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:53 MST