Re: Stroustrup's Confession (bogus?)

From: Michael Lorrey (mike@lorrey.com)
Date: Mon Mar 23 1998 - 18:38:13 MST


Erik Moeller wrote:

> >Hey, I happen to like neuter (not neutering!), so I'm feeling a little
> >germanly repressed myself! Give me a break, you could equally argue that
> >girls are neuter because they transcend the distinction between male and
> >female.
>
> Today, this would be appreciatable. At the time the German word for "girl"
> became neuter, the idea of transcension was probably, if at all, interpreted
> as a state of elevation to a place where angels and gods play nifty music.
>
> The denial of female sexuality has long traces in human history. It can be
> found in the Bible as well (along with lots of other bullshit). Even today,
> there are religous groups which claim that women cannot experience orgasm.
> Therefore, the explanation that the neuter form of "girl" was a repression
> of female sexuality seems much more likely than that it was originated to
> the meme that women will "transcend" first.

I think you are taking this wrong. I see it as a girl being pretty much like a
young boy in childhood, then transcending through a 'neuter' state, to becoming
a woman. SO if you consider that the only difference between men and boys is the
size of their toys, well, then, women have already moved beyond that.....

--
TANSTAAFL!!!
   Michael Lorrey
------------------------------------------------------------
mailto:retroman@together.net Inventor of the Lorrey Drive
MikeySoft: Graphic Design/Animation/Publishing/Engineering
------------------------------------------------------------
How many fnords did you see before breakfast today?


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:47 MST