From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Thu Feb 26 1998 - 05:28:35 MST
Daniel Gilliland <dang@whc.net> writes:
> Can someone briefly explain what was so upsetting about the
> nanotech article? ... didn't see it, myself.
Essentially it was a inaccurate and biased story claiming
nanotechnology was cargo cult science, with very little support. See
http://www.foresight.org/SciAmDebate/ for a complete overview and
comments.
The response of the Foresight Institute was admirable.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:39 MST