Searle

From: John K Clark (johnkc@well.com)
Date: Fri Feb 06 1998 - 10:55:09 MST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Fri, 6 Feb 1998 Brent Allsop <allsop@swttools.fc.hp.com> Wrote:

>one thing is very obvious, red which we use to represent 700 nm
>light, and by the way is nothing like 700 nm light since it is in our
>brain
         

True, and equally true is the fact that the data in a computer's memory that
a photo cell has received a photon of 700 nm light is nothing like that light.
I don't know if that data is anything like my idea of red, and I don't know
if your red is the same as mine either.
              

>is certainly a lot more (and much more rich in meaning resulting in
>our greater intelligence) than some mere non unified abstract set of
>bits
          

All bits are abstract whether in a brain or a machine, and if computers
contained nothing but non unified set of bits they would produce only
gibberish. They don't.
            

>where it doesn't matter if these bits are represent by a man in a
>room reading kanji, holes in paper, or quantim bits in a quantum
>computer.
            

To exist information must be in a context, otherwise a hole in a paper tape
is not data it's just a hole, but there is nothing unique about the human
mind in that regard.

As for Searle's Chinese Room, it only proves one thing, a very small part of
a mechanism does not have all the attributes of the whole.

                                             John K Clark johnkc@well.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQCzAgUBNNtQl303wfSpid95AQHpkATw2C3wsxfkynrHlZht4vxUuQ9MTW13aUOl
pfbeVXW6uW2KO4vx9wyjdPqA/yxjkbhybzrkk43MqUK3Zi4hSz0Xo8lKvPz58FTX
NLIrLZQFKdv+GC17y5qgN2Lq+z1cNsxo7T7aWNeSnbLQ2jM4oHi4NJ2BwTaOhVxn
0jGlgcngBF3yb+G6BXlU0jC5+GhI/je+GToQBuYS45IhvvK/XTY=
=qsn8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:34 MST