From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Wed Dec 17 1997 - 13:15:40 MST
"Berrie Staring" <staring@worldonline.nl> writes:
> Why (leave just pure coincidence out for now)
> do we need sex to spread our genes?
> Wouldn't it be easier if we could all make a child?
> without the sex. I mean why didn't the two
> chemicals to trigger this stay together..........
> >From the selfish gene point of view, it would double
> the "people" who w(c)ould spread the code.
I'm not sure, but I don't see any big benefit from the selfish genes
perspective with hermaphrodites; the child is still a mixture of the
parent genomes. But I think I'm missing something obvious here...
> This is of course not a suggestion to get rid of it :-)
Why not? :-) And why not make ourselves hermaphrodites anyway, so we
can have more fun (and responsibility, if we wish) - our memes should
beat our genes.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:45:14 MST