From: Anders Sandberg (asa@beattie.nada.kth.se)
Date: Fri Nov 28 1997 - 09:08:29 MST
mark@unicorn.com writes:
> phoenix@ugcs.caltech.edu wrote:
> >It's a neural network
> >implanted in the brain in childhood. It receives the same input you do,
> >and it's output is corrected by a "teacher" to conform to the output of
> >your brain.
>
> Yuck; I don't like that idea. I'm far more convinced of survival of
> identity by scanning arguments than I am by output arguments. If a
> computer is a duplicate of my brain and acts just like me I'm pretty
> much convinced that it is me in a real sense. But in this case I can
> see no good reason for believing that the internals of the network will
> bear any resemblance to mine, and hence it's unlikely to continue to
> act like me after it's disconnected.
In that case you really should read Egan's "Learning to be me". The
protagonist also struggles with this problem, with a rather surprising
and worrying conclusion.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:45:10 MST