From: Estacado66@aol.com
Date: Wed Nov 26 1997 - 12:42:36 MST
In a message dated 11/26/97 9:26:55 AM, you wrote:
<<> In a message dated 11/25/97 10:58:59 PM, you wrote:
>
> Epistemologically? Why is there no reason for believing in a closed
> universe for *epistemic* reasons?
> >>
>
> Any conceptualization of a closed universe(hold your favorite version
> of a closed universe in your mind right now) is subject to the infinite
> regress fallacy.
Hmm, I *think* you mean something like this: the conceptualization of
the closed universe will be something like a ball, inside a space of
some kind. That space will be another universe, and so on. Am I right?>>
Like I said, everyone has their favorite version.
Estacado
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:45:10 MST