Gov't NOT coercion?

From: Ian Goddard (i-am@symmetry.net)
Date: Wed Oct 29 1997 - 23:40:33 MST


John K Clark (johnkc@well.com)
>
>>I think Kristen is exactly right to suggest that there's no
>>difference between large private and large government scenarios.
>
>I think the difference is like day and night. It's true that if a private
>company kept getting bigger and more powerful and if the competition kept
>getting smaller and weaker then eventually it would be fair to call it a
>government. I can't point to the exact point where this transition occurs,
>but I can't point to the exact point where day fades into night either.

 IAN: I agree, and also that it's a fuzzy transition.

>>the only problems with gov't stem from the fact that it's so big
>
> The problem is it has no competition.

 IAN: But that it has no competition
 and that it's so big are attributes
 of the same situation: monopoly.
 In the case of gov't, a monopoly
 of de facto land ownership.
 

>>>Me:
>>>Besides, land is not very important.
>
>>IAN: It's as important as owning all of it means owning the basis of
>>everything
>
>That sounds very 18'th century-ish, times change. As an Extropian you
>know that even the old cliche about land, "they're not making any more
>of it" is not true.

 IAN: Yet virtually all Earth areas are
 already claimed. We can build up or down,
 or into or on top of water, but were still
 within and dependent upon some preexisting
 claims, until we become extraterrestrial
 in a big way.

>You should also note that the richest man in the world did not
>make his money from land but from information.

 IAN: Right, what you do on top of the
 land is most important, and yet, don't
 forget all those hard drives and such
 not only rest upon land, but came from
 land at some point. We're getting more
 and more out of every once of land thanks
 to the privatized division of ownership.

>>I'm just countering 100% anarchy. Minarchy.
>
>If it worked I wouldn't mind a small very limited government, but its
>been tried and it doesn't work because it refuses to stay small and
>limited.

 IAN: But this time it's gunna work,
 trust me... he he he. But hay, we
 also stared with anarchy and look
 where it got us. I think a system
 with some primary rules can actually
 slow down the growth of gov't. But
 growth unfortunately seems the rule.

****************************************************************
Holistic Logic ---> http://www.symmetry.net/logic/holistic.htm
________________________________________________________________



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:45:04 MST