From: Lee Daniel Crocker (lcrocker@mercury.colossus.net)
Date: Tue Oct 07 1997 - 22:36:45 MDT
> >>The Non-Aggression Principle is concisely formulated as:
> "that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force
> against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation."<<
>
> Says who and why should we care?
> Estacado
The definition you quote above was from a question by Mr. Butler; I
care now, because by quoting the definition itself out of context,
evading the question itself, and not even making any attempt to
argue with the definition, you have shown the level of intellectual
integrity I can expect from your future arguments and how seriously
I should take any future posts from you.
In case you missed it, Mr. Butler's question was:
>> What if most monopolies stem from a
>> systematic violation of the Non-Aggression Principle? That would make
>> them evil, whether they call themselves the Federation of Slobbovian
>> States or FriendlyGigantoCorp... Wouldn't it?
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:45:00 MST