From: Raiford C. Dudley Jr. (bookread@idt.net)
Date: Thu Oct 02 1997 - 23:57:53 MDT
On Thu, 2 Oct 1997 EvMick@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 97-10-01 15:39:40 EDT, you write:
>
> << > Actually, morality seems to favor species survival rather than
> > individual survival,
>
> I don't understand how you can use "rather" here, since you
> can't have one of these things without the other. If you're
> favoring one, then you're favoring the other. >>
>
>
> I just had a thought on this ...not fully formed but maybe someone else can
> do something with it...
>
> Could it be that ethics is individual while moral is group? (species, family,
> social or somethin?)
>
> Dawkins goes into some detail explaining how individual anti-survival actions
> can be pro-survival for the gene...only some of which I understand..
>
> Like I said..I'm still in a fog...
>
Here's another thought on ethics and morals. Maybe, both are
just words. Nothing more. Just words. Just words, used mostly
to manipulate people.
Hmmm...Just a thought?
Forever, we decide.
Ray
Raiford C. Dudley Jr., President
Dudley Accelerated Learning Systems
<http://www.quickness.com/~speedreading/> <bookread@idt.net>
1-800-205-7432...The 24-hour toll-free 800 number where we
will double your reading speed and comprehension while you
are on the telephone. You too can experience "Total Recall".
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:59 MST