Re: Doggone II (was: Re: sacred geometry)

From: CALYK@aol.com
Date: Wed Sep 24 1997 - 00:48:00 MDT

• Next message: Hara Ra: "Re: sacred geometry"
• Previous message: Jim Legg: "Re: META: NSPIC debate - I resign extropy"
• Maybe in reply to: Damien Broderick: "Doggone II (was: Re: sacred geometry)"
• Next in thread: Damien Broderick: "Re: Doggone II"
• Reply: Damien Broderick: "Re: Doggone II"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 97-09-23 21:46:17 EDT, you write:

<< >Why did you say it was untrue?
 
 If you can't find the Skeptical Inquirer issue I mentioned, you could read
 Carl Sagan's BROCA'S BRAIN, pages 69-75, which deals with the Dogon story
 and its probable early 20th century source. Then read the rest of the
 book, then read the rest of Sagan's books. They're great!
>>

What is false about the story, if you could generalize it, unless the
inquirer is online.

thanks

danny

• Next message: Hara Ra: "Re: sacred geometry"
• Previous message: Jim Legg: "Re: META: NSPIC debate - I resign extropy"
• Maybe in reply to: Damien Broderick: "Doggone II (was: Re: sacred geometry)"
• Next in thread: Damien Broderick: "Re: Doggone II"
• Reply: Damien Broderick: "Re: Doggone II"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:57 MST