world pacification

From: Anton Sherwood (dasher@netcom.com)
Date: Thu Sep 18 1997 - 18:59:28 MDT


Arjen Kamphuis writes
: [...] any and all human-rights violations should be ended (by force if
: neccecary) by a sort of world governement.

Why a world government? Why not thousands of volunteer forces
in parallel? If there's just one super-state, what happens
when *that* goes bad?

: Altough I would never use the term conquer the world.

(How else can you create a world government?)

: Just remove the dictator and then organize elections A.S.A.P and get out.

What is on the ballot? Candidates for new dictator?
Forms of government? New boundaries?

: And I'd like their to be *lots* of controls on the UN.

Such as?

: [...] If you say crack should remain illegal on the basis
: of its harmfull effect on heath you should also prohibit:
:
: Smoking, drinking, eating to much red-meat/fat/minerals/vitamine-C,
: riding motorcycles-without-a-helmet, parachute jumping, mountain
: climbing, working too hard....
:
: (Gosh, I'm beginning to sound like an honest-to-god-libertarian)

Put your head between your knees and take deep breaths. ;)

(Too much vitamin C??)

Anton Sherwood *\\* +1 415 267 0685 *\\* DASher@netcom.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:55 MST