Re: Long term genome (was Re:Is crypreservation a solution?)

From: Joao Pedro (jpnitya@mail.esoterica.pt)
Date: Fri Sep 19 1997 - 23:51:14 MDT


Hi!

I wrote:
> >...................
> >'basic ones'? If aging was a result of 'basic' errors, evolution would
> >soon had found a way to prevent aging which is not the case for our
> >species.
> >...................
 
Prof. Jose Gomes Filho replied:
> I disgree with you...

That's OK, no-one's perfect (just kidding).

> I simply include the hability developped by some
> animals of transforming the environment as a consequence of evolution. In
> particular, the humans get to change its *own* physical characteristics (
> the possibility of using glasses is a consequence of evolution "acting"
> through humans... or not ???). This way, evolution * found a way * to seeing
> better...

Evolution? Are you trying to say that all human accomplishments are also
a result of evolution?

-- 
         Hasta la vista...
"Life's too short to cry, long enough to try." - Kai Hansen
Visit my site at: http://mithlond.esoterica.pt/~jpnitya/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:55 MST