From: Prof. Jose Gomes Filho (gomes@dpx.cnen.gov.br)
Date: Wed Sep 17 1997 - 14:09:24 MDT
At 18:38 14/09/97 -0700, Joao Pedro <jpnitya@mail.esoterica.pt> wrote:
>...................
>'basic ones'? If aging was a result of 'basic' errors, evolution would
>soon had found a way to prevent aging which is not the case for our
>species.
>...................
I disgree with you... I simply include the hability developped by some
animals of transforming the environment as a consequence of evolution. In
particular, the humans get to change its *own* physical characteristics (
the possibility of using glasses is a consequence of evolution "acting"
through humans... or not ???). This way, evolution * found a way * to seeing
better...
I simply do not understand why is the so-called artificiallity still
considered as an opposite to naturallity, instead of a particular case of
it.........
Respectfully,
Gomes
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:55 MST