From: Dan Fabulich (daniel.fabulich@yale.edu)
Date: Tue Sep 16 1997 - 23:01:45 MDT
At 06:59 PM 9/16/97 -0700, Michael M. Butler wrote:
>John Stuart Mill never (to my knowledge) called himself a Libertarian. The
>term was used exclusively in a theological context until sometime in the
>mid-to-late nineteenth century.
Again, take a close look at JS Mill's _On Liberty_.
>We can't go ask Mill whether he'd have agreed with, say, Harry Browne as a
>Presidential candidate.
Perhaps not, but his committment to individual liberty as a means towards
utility is indubitable.
>"Wrong"? I intend to work on what they left out. I don't have time to work
>on "Why they are wrong", any more than any other good
>experimentalist-theoretician.
My implicit point was that if they are NOT wrong, then my premises are
correct, and libertarianism is ethical.
>One word of advice: if you stand behind a wall of great thinkers, it
>decreases your chance of becoming a good one yourself.
True... But now is not the time to unleash my ethics, politics and
economics thesis on the world. Give me a few years! :)
-SAVE THE WHALES-
-COLLECT THE WHOLE SET-
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:54 MST