From: Prof. Jose Gomes Filho (gomes@dpx.cnen.gov.br)
Date: Tue Sep 09 1997 - 16:11:55 MDT
At 13:33 08/09/97 -0400, Hagbard Celine wrote:
>Arjen Kamphuis wrote:
>
>> 1) Why is it that only about 20% of the population caries a document that
>> allow doctors to use their organs in case of sudden death, while over 90%
>> of the population wishes to receive donororgans if it can save (=extend)
>> their life.
>
>MYTH: Document saying "Organ Donor" equals "Maybe we should best let
>this one die."
>
>A lot of people I know buy into this one.
>
>My reasons for not volunteering?
>
>Why would I want to decrease my chances of post-cryonic reanimation by
>giving away my vitals?
>
Really... Completely right... But is our "frozing option" freely permitted
and adopted by law????
Indeed, if we die tomorrow, I suppose that just will live better the
nechro-bacterias...
Ah, and about cryogeny : it is the better warranty against the ignorance of
the great majority of our "brothers" of the present intellectual age...
Only God to forgiving them... (as I'm an atheist.... hehehe)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:51 MST