From: adrian_karth_at_netconnect@smtpgate.netcon.co.za
Date: Sun Sep 07 1997 - 08:51:28 MDT
Message is undeliverable.
Reason: Unable to access cc:Mail Post office.
Please retry later.
Original text follows:
---------------------
Received: from maxwell.lucifer.com by smtpgate.netcon.co.za (ccMail Link to SMTP R6.0)
; Sun, 07 Sep 97 06:51:20 +0200
Return-Path: <postmaster@extropy.org>
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by maxwell.lucifer.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA14079 for extropians-outgoing; Sat, 6 Sep 1997 20:27:23 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.lucifer.com: majordom set sender to postmaster@extropy.org using -f
Message-ID: <341210BA.7AE9@clemmensen.shirenet.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 22:26:02 -0400
From: Dan@Clemmensen.ShireNet.com (Dan Clemmensen)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: extropians@extropy.org
Subject: Re: NANO: Lessons learned
References: <970906184839_86287207@emout10.mail.aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: postmaster@extropy.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: extropians@extropy.org
CALYK@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 97-09-06 16:33:54 EDT, you write:
>
> << >3. Unintentional gray goo is not a serious problem.
> >>
>
> Not if you dont mind being slowly eaten alive.
>
> danny
I took the original assertion to mean that, since we must
defend against intentionally malevolent goo, we would therefore
not need to worry separately about unintentionally destructinve
goo because the same defense would also work against the
lesser threat.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:50 MST