From: adrian_karth_at_netconnect@smtpgate.netcon.co.za
Date: Sat Sep 06 1997 - 11:11:37 MDT
Message is undeliverable.
Reason: Unable to access cc:Mail Post office.
Please retry later.
Original text follows:
---------------------
Received: from maxwell.lucifer.com by smtpgate.netcon.co.za (ccMail Link to SMTP R6.0)
; Sat, 06 Sep 97 09:11:30 +0200
Return-Path: <postmaster@extropy.org>
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by maxwell.lucifer.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA20010 for extropians-outgoing; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 23:11:31 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.lucifer.com: majordom set sender to postmaster@extropy.org using -f
From: adrian_karth_at_netconnect@smtpgate.netcon.co.za
Message-Id: <9709068735.AA873524659@smtpgate.netcon.co.za>
X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R6.0
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 97 07:44:19 +0200
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at aquilla.netcon.co.za
To: extropians@extropy.org
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at aquilla.netcon.co.za
Subject: cc:Mail Link to SMTP Undeliverable Message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="simple boundary"
Sender: postmaster@extropy.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: extropians@extropy.org
Message is undeliverable.
Reason: Unable to access cc:Mail Post office.
Please retry later.
Original text follows:
---------------------
Received: from maxwell.lucifer.com by smtpgate.netcon.co.za (ccMail Link to SMTP R6.0)
; Fri, 05 Sep 97 21:44:08 +0200
Return-Path: <postmaster@extropy.org>
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by maxwell.lucifer.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA30847 for extropians-outgoing; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 11:52:45 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.lucifer.com: majordom set sender to postmaster@extropy.org using -f
To: extropians@extropy.org
Subject: Re: Goo prophylaxis:consensus
References: <199709051607.JAA04850@crypt.hfinney.com>
From: Anders Sandberg <asa@nada.kth.se>
Date: 05 Sep 1997 19:40:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: Hal Finney's message of "Fri, 5 Sep 1997 09:07:55 -0700"
Message-ID: <b49u3fzirqt.fsf@void.nada.kth.se>
Lines: 31
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.63/Emacs 19.34
Sender: postmaster@extropy.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: extropians@extropy.org
Hal Finney <hal@rain.org> writes:
> Anders Sandberg writes:
> >
> > Art? The tendency to never throw away anything that could someday become
> > useful?
>
> Well, that's my question. When would it be useful? How would it be useful?
> Give me some ideas of what you're thinking of, here.
Most intelligent beings are aware of the possibility that resources
which at present are useless can become vital, even if they can't foresee
any use for them right now. So if the cost of retaining the resources
is fairly low, they will be inclined to retain them if they think
the potential future use (which is by definition unknown) is high.
A typical example is academics, who copy and print papers and then
carefully pile them in their offices for "future reference" (and nesting?).
Note that the evaluation of potential future use is highly individual,
and can be motivated by more or less random heuristics left from the
"childhood" of the intelligent agent. So it is hard to tell if they
are always present, but if the cost of keeping the biosphere is K,
the cost of removing it is R and the cost of recreating it is C
then the biosphere will be preserved if K < R + C.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~nv91-asa/main.html GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y --simple boundary--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:49 MST