From: adrian_karth_at_netconnect@smtpgate.netcon.co.za
Date: Sat Sep 06 1997 - 09:39:45 MDT
Message is undeliverable.
Reason: Unable to access cc:Mail Post office.
Please retry later.
Original text follows:
---------------------
Received: from maxwell.lucifer.com by smtpgate.netcon.co.za (ccMail Link to SMTP R6.0)
; Sat, 06 Sep 97 07:39:37 +0200
Return-Path: <postmaster@extropy.org>
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by maxwell.lucifer.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA17757 for extropians-outgoing; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 22:01:21 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.lucifer.com: majordom set sender to postmaster@extropy.org using -f
From: adrian_karth_at_netconnect@smtpgate.netcon.co.za
Message-Id: <9709068735.AA873520446@smtpgate.netcon.co.za>
X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R6.0
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 97 06:34:06 +0200
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at aquilla.netcon.co.za
To: extropians@extropy.org
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at aquilla.netcon.co.za
Subject: cc:Mail Link to SMTP Undeliverable Message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="simple boundary"
Sender: postmaster@extropy.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: extropians@extropy.org
Message is undeliverable.
Reason: Unable to access cc:Mail Post office.
Please retry later.
Original text follows:
---------------------
Received: from maxwell.lucifer.com by smtpgate.netcon.co.za (ccMail Link to SMTP R6.0)
; Fri, 05 Sep 97 20:33:56 +0200
Return-Path: <postmaster@extropy.org>
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by maxwell.lucifer.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA27834 for extropians-outgoing; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 10:19:40 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.lucifer.com: majordom set sender to postmaster@extropy.org using -f
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 09:07:55 -0700
From: Hal Finney <hal@rain.org>
Message-Id: <199709051607.JAA04850@crypt.hfinney.com>
To: extropians@extropy.org
Subject: Re: Goo prophylaxis:consensus
Sender: postmaster@extropy.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: extropians@extropy.org
Anders Sandberg writes:
>
> Hal Finney <hal@rain.org> writes:
>
> > I can't imagine a plausible situation in which an entity
> > with the kinds of powers that nanotech confers is going to find itself
> > needing access to information from its biological past. This may be
> > a failure of imagination on my part though. What kinds of things could
> > you see happening where it would need this information?
>
> Art? The tendency to never throw away anything that could someday become
> useful?
Well, that's my question. When would it be useful? How would it be useful?
Give me some ideas of what you're thinking of, here. My conception is that
the Power is so, well, Powerful that I can't see how the historical
knowledge would matter. But most other people seem to disagree, so I'd
appreciate some examples.
Thanks,
Hal
--simple boundary--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:49 MST