From: Dan Clemmensen (Dan@Clemmensen.ShireNet.com)
Date: Wed Sep 03 1997 - 18:53:01 MDT
Pat Fallon wrote:
>
> I showed the thread on alternative energy sources to a friend of mine (Jamie
> Naizby), and he had the following comments:
>
> The person talking about hydrogen flammability limits was very likely confusing
> hydrogen in oxygen limits with hydrogen in AIR limits... two very different
> situations. Yes, flammability limits in OXYGEN are from 4.7 to 15 and 90 to 93.9
> with detonation limits in between (15 to 90% by volume) BUT this is good! It is
> one of the reasons it is a vastly superior fuel to all others in use now..
> The flammability limits of hydrogen in AIR are 4.0 to 18.2 and again above
> detonation limits at from 58.9 to 75% with the 18.2 to 58.9% by volume zone
> between the detonation limits this is a fuel it has to burn to work. Propane
> in use everywhere with hardly anyone objecting has DETONATION limits from 2.1
> to 9.5 in AIR! (would prefer to use hydrogen)
>
Sorry about that. I was responding with a recollection
of hearsay instead of checking some sources. Thanks for the
correction. However, I still seem to recall that the big concern
with hydrogen included the risks of explosion when transported
in pipelines. Does anyone have a reference for this?
Note that there is a lot less hydrogen in a bettery-type fuel cell
(i.e., one in which consumes electricity to produec hydrogen, then
later used the hydrogen to produce electricity) than there is in
a pipeline, so the safety engineering is probably more tractable.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:48 MST