From: Lee Daniel Crocker (lcrocker@calweb.com)
Date: Wed Sep 03 1997 - 18:15:33 MDT
> > I have no problem with any publication doing whatever it wants...I'm a huge
> > adherent to the principles of the Free Market...But I think there should be
> > some honesty and integrety...The writing that I have read of Rifkin are
> > Luddite...or so my impression...for SA to lend credibillity to him decreases
> > their own already lessened credibility in my view.
>
> In fairness to Sci Am I should mention that the article was a fairly
> evenhanded depiction of Rifkin, that didn't explicitly, or implicitly
> as far as I could tell,
> endorse his views. Anyone interested in science needs to be aware of
> those who oppose it. I found it a useful article b/c I know
> very little about Rifkin, though I don't think the article in question
> presented the whole picture.
But the fact that they were apparently "evenhanded" is itself a ringing
endorsement; they chose to portray him seriously, rather than deriding
him entirely as a crackpot, as any rational scientist would.
It doesn't surprize me; SciAm has been a propaganda rag for a long time.
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:48 MST