META: Psuedo-Science (crop circles)

From: Rick Knight (rknight@platinum.com)
Date: Tue Sep 02 1997 - 15:10:56 MDT


     Not being a scientist, only fascinated by it, I probably take a
     decidedly different path from the more high-brow attitudes towards
     topics that occasionally surface on this digest and are ceremoniously
     doused (heaven forbid the "Goo" thread was ever so quickly dismissed)
     because of their "Moulder" rather than "Scully" like quality. (I'm
     using pop icons as adjectives...wild!)
     
     For instance, in the area of Crop Cirlces, about which I know
     relatively little, it is an intriguing notion to think that they might
     be communications (such as those suggested in the film "Contact"). A
     scientific mind may seek to discredit crop circles as hoaxes by
     pointing out the "proof" that they are man-made. In my mind, that
     doesn't take into account a number of variables, many, alas,
     metaphysical in nature and thus, likely discreditable under classic
     scientific scrutiny.
     
     However, I consider that the circles, whether they be hoaxes done by
     clever humans or cryptic messages from an advances off-world race, to
     be a fascinating phenomenon, at least archetypally and sociologically.
      Some "hoaxes" are deliberate, confessed after the fact to be so, not
     to discredit but to continue a dialog in earnest. The human-made
     circles I'm told are often done with the utmost reverence, employing
     sacred geometry, considering time and location thoughtfully and
     planned out for months in advance.
     
     One might say that such an elaborate hoax and expenditure of time is
     all for naught. But even the effect it has on the different camps of
     thought on the legitmacy of crop circles is a fascinating byproduct
     for it "shakes the tree of knowledge" so to speak. Whether it
     provokes with fascination or irritates and divides groups of
     discussion, it has its place.
     
     The real world of qualified scientific phenomenon may well be utterly
     more fascinating than the more fanciful and supernatural notions
     sometimes expressed here but whether one outweighs the other in
     importance is up to the individual to decide. Science and imagination
     should be free to comingle and dance together to produce possibilities
     to come. I'll leave it to the moderators as to how to regulate a
     balance that doesn't abruptly dismiss or matter-of-factly discredit.
     
     Rick



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:48 MST