Re: Goo prophylaxis (was: Hanson antiproliferation method?)

From: The Low Golden Willow (phoenix@ugcs.caltech.edu)
Date: Tue Aug 26 1997 - 11:31:53 MDT


On Aug 26, 3:58pm, "Nicholas Bostrom" wrote:
} Hal Finney <hal@rain.org> wrote:
}
} I prefer to use the term grey goo to denote whatever nanites cause
} indiscriminate destruction. But anyway, nanites could be designed to
} be interested solely in destruction.
 
In that case you won't have very many of them. No replication, no
nanites.

} >gray goo must replicate in order to be effective. A single gray goo
} >disassembler will not cause much damage. And whatever mechanisms it
} >uses to replicate will be vulnerable to attack just as much as the
} >systems which it is trying to "eat".
}
} Yes. The goo might fight a downhill battle, though, towards a lower
} energy state? It would be interesting to think about this in more

Not if it's made of diamond. And I doubt that replacing one form of
life with another form of life yields much portential energy.

Merry part,
 -xx- Damien R. Sullivan X-) <*> http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~phoenix

Beneath these hills great heroes lie
Of the Red Branch Knights and their ancient foe.
In still of night the immortals fight
But never the battle is won.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:46 MST