From: Sunah Caroline Cherwin (slippery@pobox.com)
Date: Sun Aug 17 1997 - 20:44:16 MDT
Ka-Ping Yee:
>>Then again, it sounds like what we're after is a radio
>>transmitter: one that you don't need to intentionally
>>activate broadcasting for. But your batteries wouldn't last.
>>
OK, this isn't really hard science, but if they were really personality
transmitters (not radio transmitters), they would energize each other by
recieving as well as sending. The presence of transmitter B would cause
transmitter A to send its message, and B would get the message with a pulse
of energy, stimulating it to send its message to A.
--
Sunah Caroline Cherwin + + http://pobox.com/~sunah
Member: HTML Writer's Guild + Member: San Francisco Webgrrls
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:44 MST