From: Damien Broderick (damien@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Fri Aug 15 1997 - 06:14:56 MDT
At 01:44 PM 8/14/97 -0400, Wax wrote:
>Try CETI (http://www.math.ucla.edu/~barry/CF/reportcover.html)
You neglect to mention their conclusion:
`Our replication effort is based on the CETI patents, and discussions with
individuals
who have experience with the device.
`So far we have been unable to reproduce CETI's claimed excess heat
results. For example, in a
setup in which CETI appears to obtain 4 Watts of heat output for a 0.06
Watt input, no excess heat
production was observed, with a detection limit of 0.3 Watts.'
Damien Broderick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:43 MST